Anyway, all are making big claims to resolve the problems of people after being successful in the local body’s elections. However, the fact is that the real issue of the people of urban Sindh is the discrimination and the consequent injustice done by the political and military establishments against them. And the problems that people have been facing for decades (like lawlessness, unemployment, load shedding, water and sewerage etc) are the results of the same.
Although MQM struggled against it and give unmatched sacrifices for the purpose, but no other party supported it. Instead, they played extremely hostile role against it. Jamat-e-Islami (JI) has been the oldest and the biggest opponent of MQM in the Karachi`s politics.
It, from the beginning, kept on bashing MQM over speaking for the rights of Muhajirs. It blamed that using the word “Muhajir” as identity was against the teachings of Islam. In the support, it also quoted some verses from the holly Quran as well as Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad (saws).
However, Jamat-e-Islami did not ever hesitate to keep friendly relationship and even to make political alliances with the Sindhi nationalists, Liyari gangsters, Haqiqi (which was against opening the MQM`s doors for other ethnic communities) and sectarian groups in the elections.
Furthermore, the JI leadership frequently
used the word “Pashtuns” as identity for the people killed in the US drone
attacks or in the army operation in tribal areas. (Perhaps, as per JI`s
interpretation, the words “Pashtun”, “Sindhi”, ”Balochi”, “Punjabi” and
“Kashmiri” were not prohibited in Islam unlike the term “Muhajir”) .
Jamat-e-Islami
always adopted anti-MQM (anti-Karachi) stances whenever it was time to come on
one page over an issue for the rights of people. When PPP`s government ended
the journey of development by wrapping up the Pervez Musharaf`s City Government
system, none of the parties (which keep claiming to own Karachi and Hyderabad)
raised its voice over it except MQM.
Similarly, when MQM despite so many
reservations, agreed to the PPP`s drafted new local body`s (Sindh People`s Local
Body`s) Act with the intention to provide some relief to the people, all the parties
including JI, PTI, ANP and PML-N not only strongly opposed it calling it
discriminatory, but also violently protested along with the Sindhi nationalists.
Logically,
the Act could not be discriminatory as it was mutually agreed by both the
parties representing rural and urban Sindh. That was why not a single
discriminating clause could be referred to as a proof by the rivals.
Anyway, as
a result of the pressure from the Sindhi nationalists, PPP rolled the SPLB Act
back too which added to the miseries of people especially in Karachi and
Hyderabad. By adopting a hostile attitude over the said Act, JI and PTI not only
created hurdles in resolving people`s issues, but also deliberately deepened
the ethnic divide between Sindhis and Muhajirs,
For
instance, if it was their principle stand against a so-called inequitable law (SPLB
Act) in Sindh and that was why they came out on roads, then why the hell did they
not show such a reaction over so many discriminatory laws and decisions especially
including the enforcement of Quota system and its several times extensions??
It is
also on record that when the Taliban extremists were being targeted through the
US drones and in army operations, the leadership of Jamat-e-Islami not only
bashed the Pak army, but also termed the killed terrorists as “Shaheed”
(martyrs).
In contrast to it, when the lawlessness was imposed on the
Karachi-ites in the name of army and Rangers operations in the 90`s (which turned
out to be the genocide of Urdu speaking community), it was the same JI which not
only fully supported the operations, but also justified the killings terming as
“the
consequence of their own ill-deeds”.
That was, no doubt, the height of hatred by JI for Muhajirs.
JUI-F`s
leader Moulana Fazal-ur-Rehman too, like JI`s Munawwar Hassan, termed the
killed Taliban as martyrs. He went too far while expressing his soft feelings
for the religious terrorists saying, “Even if a dog is killed by US, he would also
be called Shaheed”. However, he never ever uttered a single word of
condemnation or sympathy over the mass killings of Muhajirs in the disguise of
operations in Karachi. This shows the value of Urdu speaking people before these
so-called religious leaders.
Like other
right wing leaders, PTI`s Imran Khan too has been extremely against military
operations in tribal areas. He repeatedly criticized any kind of actions
against Taliban groups saying nowhere in the world army of a country kills
its own people. In this respect, he also urged the state authorities to
humbly consider the reasons why the Taliban groups picked up the weapons in
their hands.
However, quite opposite to his “principle stand”, Imran Khan always
demanded a brutal operation in Karachi. Perhaps, as per his vision, it was
logical for a state`s army and Rangers to kill their own people only in Karachi
and that there was no need to take into account their long-prevailing
grievances humbly before taking any
action against them.
In the
same way, PTI leadership demanded and supported new administrative units/provinces
all over the country for devolution of powers and authorities.
But, at the same
time, PTI made it very clear that it would strongly oppose such a thing for
Karachi-ites.Keeping in view the enmity, hatred and prejudice of all these political and religious parties for Karachi and Hyderabad, do they deserve the votes of the people living here? How can the parties, which themselves created problems for the residents of urban Sindh, be sincerity towards resolving them? No, not at all!
No comments:
Post a Comment