The “debut” of the Muhajir Republic Army” took place when the
Attorney General of Pakistan submitted a report on behalf of the Federal
Interior Ministry to the Supreme Court. In the report, the Attorney-General Munir A Malik used the term ‘Muhajir Republican
Army’ for a shadowy group that was believed to be involved in spreading
violence in Karachi. The report called for
action against members of the group when they were identified.
As soon as the news channel broke this news of such a report,
the political analysts and anchorpersons started giving their reactions on it differently.
However, the most relevant reaction was from the MQM`s Quaid Mr. Altaf Hussain.
He called the idea of a ‘Muhajir Republican Army’
another malicious gaffe after the so-called ‘Jinnah pur’ conspiracy. He called upon the Chief Justice to launch an impartial investigation
regarding the mischief-makers behind this ‘army’.
Obviously,
it was really surprising to first time hear about a group, as per the report, named
as “Muhajir Republic Army” that was believed to be involved in the violence of Karachi.
To tell the truth, not speaking of naming such a group in any report, this term
had never been used even in an allegation by anyone. More importantly, the Sindh
Police officials expressed their surprise on it and denied to have come across
any criminal who turned out to be a group member of so-called Muhajir Republic
Army. The most surprising element of this report came up before the people of
Pakistan when The government on Friday withdrew its written reply from the
Supreme Court on Friday when Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan claimed
that the report was not ‘perfect. However, he claimed that yet the report was
based on facts.
Despite
so much confusion even among the people who introduced “Muhajir Rebulic Army”,
almost all the News channels and news papers had made it the hottest topic of
the town. Some of them were giving their “expert”opinions as if they had already
done a thesis on this group. The question is, is it sensible to beat the drum
of the still intangible and invisible dream army that can question the
patriotism of a specific community and its representative party??
A couple
of weeks ago, the various journalist`s organization staged protests on the case
registered against ARY News on airing the video of burning the Ziarat Residency.
The Balochistan Police had registered a case (which, later on, had to be taken back
on the pressure of the media) under the Anti-Terrorist Act of 1997 against the
chief executive of ARY News, and some other employees. The Balochistan
government had alleged in the FIR that ARY News, in its current affairs program,
ran “objectionable video clips” released by an outlawed outfit about the
destruction of Ziarat Residency after an attack in June. The department called
for legal action against the channel.
Not
only this, even before the Balochistan government, the Chief
Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry had taken a suo moto notice on the same ARY`s program stating that
it was a violation of the provisions of the Constitution. He also expressed his
displeasure saying, “For
God sake, demonstrate seriousness”.
The
question is, why was the case registered against ARY especially under the
Anti-Terrorist Act? In fact, whatever was telecast by ARY not only was based on
the facts, but also some of its parts had already been aired almost by all the
news channels immediately after the burning of the Ziarat
Residency, then how could the re-telecasting of the same have been termed as an
act of terrorism? Moreover, the main objective of telecasting that
video was to reveal that the Ziarat Residency was exploded from within as the
terrorists of BLA were carrying gas cylinders, after the claims made by the
security agencies that the Ziarat Residency was attacked by the terrorists with
rockets fired/bombs, etc. Thus, the question is, is it an act of terrorism to
bring to light the reality before the common people? Is the ill-doer “Balochistan
Liberation Army” not proudly claiming to have caused the national tragedy of
Pakistan? On top of it, can what the ARY aired about the incident of the
Ziyarat Residency be denied anyway? When no, then what to accuse ARY of doing?
However, as per the Article 19A of the Constitution, every
citizen shall have the right to have access to information in all matters of
public importance subject to regulation and reasonable restrictions imposed by
law. Similarly, the Article 19 of the Constitution provides that: “Every
citizen shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, and there
shall be freedom of the press, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed
by law in the interest of the glory of Islam or the integrity, security or
defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, friendly relations with foreign
states, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court,
commission of or incitement to an offence.” Similarly, the Section 11-W
of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 also puts restrictions on dissemination of
objectionable material and the same is made punishable offence.
The
question is, if bringing to light the reality to the general public can be considered
as the violation of the Anti-Terrorism Act, then what about introducing the new
myth, i.e., “Muhajir Republic Army” which, by now, has no concrete evidence or
proof about its existence? When telecasting a factually based video can seem, even
as per the understanding of the Chief Justice of Supreme Court Of Pakistan, to be
the material as an infringement of the provisions of the Constitution, then why
not the malicious act of relating a shadowy group (Muhajir Republic Army) to
the most patriotic community of the country? Should such an act of the Interior
Ministry not be declared as an extremely condemn able act of inciting ethnic
hatred and giving projection to militancy in the county? Why is the propagation
of an still invisible and physically non-existing “ghost army” not being considered
as contrary to the provisions of section 11-W of
the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 that says,
“A person commits an offence if he prints, publishes or
disseminates any material, whether by audio or video-cassettes or by written,
photographic, electronic, digital, wall-chalking or any other method which
incites religious, sectarian or ethnic hatred or gives projection to any person
convicted for a terrorist act, or any person or organization concerned in
terrorism or proscribed organization or an organization placed under
observation”?
The question is, will such a double standard of the Pakistani
Institutions ever help to promote unity in the country where there are already so
many differences among different ethnic communities? Specially, in the situation
where the Urdu speaking community and its representative party MQM had already
become the victim of the political as well as ethnic victimization on the basis
of a similar myth of “Jinnah Pur”, will the repetition of the past not be a deliberate
attempt to force the victims to eventually adopt these myths?? If the Supreme
Court does not take notice of these conspiracies and fails to provide justice, who
else will do that? “For
God`s sake, demonstrate seriousness!”
No comments:
Post a Comment